Portland tops list of airport passenger, airport screener layoffs

By Leslie Miller, Associated Press Writer
Friday, July 29, 2005 | 6 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
WASHINGTON - The government plans to reshuffle its passenger and baggage screeners, drawing protests from some airports slated to lose workers.

Pittsburgh and Portland will be among those taking the biggest hits. Las Vegas, Dulles International Airport in Washington and Los Angeles International Airport will gain, according to the plan, which will be implemented in the next couple of months.

Rep. Earl Blumenauer, D-Ore., called the cuts "shortsighted and inexcusable."

In a letter to the Transportation Security Administration, Blumenauer said the plan would cut 168 security screeners from Portland International Airport, which already has one of the longest wait times of any airport in the country.

"A cut of this magnitude - over one-third of the total number of screeners and the largest cut of any airport in the United States - will only increase these already unacceptably high wait times," said Blumenauer, who serves on the House Transportation Committee.

His concerns are shared by the Port of Portland, which owns the airport, Blumenauer added.

The TSA defended the moves Thursday, saying the goal is to better allocate screeners to ensure that airports with the greatest needs have adequate staffs. The overall work force will remain at 45,000.

"There are some airports that we believe are overstaffed and some we believe are understaffed," Tom Blank, TSA's acting deputy administrator, told the House Homeland Security subcommittee on economic security, infrastructure protection and cybersecurity.

Mark Brewer, who heads T.F. Green Airport in Providence, R.I., questioned why his facility will lose 32 full-time employees, or 13 percent of its work force, at a time when record numbers of people are using it.

"We're very, very concerned about the reduction in staffing," Brewer said.

Blank said the TSA considered many factors when it reallocated the screeners. Those include the number of checkpoints, flights and passengers at each airport - all of which change.

The TSA, created after the Sept. 11 attacks to oversee airport security, faced early criticism for failing to properly staff some major airports, leading to long lines of passengers. The agency made its first adjustments last year, shifting some jobs to better reflect passenger traffic that has returned to pre-Sept. 11 levels.

Among the hardest hit under the new plan is Pittsburgh International Airport, which will lose 122 people, more than a third of its screeners. Portland International Airport will lose 168, also about a third.

Some adjustments will be slight. Chicago's O'Hare International Airport will decline from 1,577 screeners to 1,571, and Hartsfield-Jackson in Atlanta will go from 1,082 to 1,061.

McCarran International Airport in Las Vegas, which often has some of the longest waits, will be one of the biggest gainers, with 247 more screeners, a 30 percent increase. Los Angeles International Airport will get another 120 screeners for a total of 2,157.

Congress is considering trimming screeners. The House voted to cut 2,000 jobs next year, while the Senate approved a reduction of 6,000. The two figures must be reconciled before President Bush can sign a reduction into law as part of the Homeland Security spending bill.

James Bennett, who heads the Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority, said the TSA's ability to screen passengers and bags already is being pushed to the limit because so many people are flying.

"Without dramatic changes to the aviation security model in use today, we will not be able to meet the demands," Bennett said.

Airports have the option of using privately employed screeners, which they did before the Sept. 11 attacks, but so far only two have asked the TSA for permission to do so - Sioux Falls Regional Airport in South Dakota and Elko Regional Airport in Nevada. Sioux Falls' application was approved Wednesday.

Associated Press Writer Matthew Daly contributed to this story.

---

On the Net:

TSA's plan, airport-by-airport: http://wid.ap.org/documents/2005screeners.html

Transportation Security Administration: http://www.tsa.gov
Tags »
Previous
Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

Nick Reynolds wrote on Apr 25, 2008 7:01 PM:

Uh...ok!?
I personally think this is a great idea. As a fan of target shooting I sometimes try and find somewhere in the woods somewhere to shoot and it's hard to find a place where it will be safe. This will help eliminate shot up signs and busted glass in the woods and on the back trails. Let's hurry and make this happen!

sesshh wrote on Aug 5, 2007 9:05 AM:

This whole thing is just a Peliosi/Reid socialist machine cat fight with the president.They could care less about what is really needed(As usual).All they care about is another jab against thier enemy Bush.

heidi wrote on Jul 15, 2007 9:59 PM:

what about people not stopping for the school buses with their lights flashing at a stop for are child.

Tina wrote on Jul 15, 2007 12:50 PM:

what was the driver deaf or what to not know he was possible going to be hit by a police cruiser?

don wrote on Jul 14, 2007 1:44 PM:

Well, that is a good example of the type of drivers there are around here. I have never seen so many people DISOBEY the law in my life. I have come close to getting hit from behind twice and I was STOPPED. There are a lot of bad drivers around here.

Richard wrote on Nov 30, 2006 12:53 PM:

Very nice article, unfortunately pretty soon the morons are going to start blaming the rainfall on "global warming." Only morons believe global has anything to do with humanity, or humans can do anything about it. Imbeciles...all of 'em.


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections