Bill to repeal couger hunt limits


Thursday, May 26, 2005 | 1 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
SALEM (AP) - Voter-approved restrictions on cougar and bear hunting could be lifted by counties under a bill approved by a House panel, drawing criticism from wildlife advocates.

The House Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee approved the bill Wednesday without advance notice as an amendment to a bill that would ban the use of remote-controlled weapons to shoot wildlife using the Internet.

Environmentalists and animal-rights supporters were angered that the proposal was attached to another bill, a common tactic for moving controversial legislation.

"It's a dirty deal. It's the kind of thing that would not get out of here if it had to stand on its own," said Sally Mackler, wildlife issues coordinator for the Oregon chapter of the Sierra Club.

The amended version of Senate Bill 689 passed 6-1 and now heads to the House floor. It would allow citizens to petition their county commissions to refer to the local ballot a vote on whether to permit the practice of using bait to lure bears and dogs to track cougars and drive them up into trees practices that were banned in a statewide vote in 1994.

Committee Chairwoman Patti Smith said she brought up the surprise amendment Wednesday because it was "the opportune time." The Corbett Republican acknowledged that it is controversial to tack an amendment on to a bill without public notice, denying a chance to prepare and present testimony.

"That's kind of the way it is," Smith said. "It happens to a lot of us here."

She said the hunting issue was more important than questions about legislative procedure.

Bear and cougar hunting has been a politically sensitive issue since 1994, when voters passed an initiative banning the use of bait to lure bears and hounds to track cougars.

Urban voters backed wildlife protection while rural Oregonians saw the measure as a limit on recreation and as a risk to human life and property because the bear and cougar population was controlled by hunters.

In 1996, a measure to repeal that law was rejected on a statewide ballot. In the past decade, lawmakers have proposed measures to roll back or loosen the hunting restrictions, but have failed.

Since 1994, Oregon's cougar population has grown from 3,100 to 5,500, said Ron Anglin, director of the Wildlife Division at the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife.

Hunting restrictions are the main reason for the population explosion, and the increase in reported cases of cougar sightings and cougar attacks on pets and livestock, Anglin said.

Smith said the problem is getting serious enough that lawmakers must put their concern for protecting human life and property ahead of their worries about voter backlash.

She had backed a separate measure, House Bill 2759, which would create pilot areas throughout the state, including Douglas and Coos counties, where cougar hunting with dogs would be allowed. But the bill has been languishing for two months in a budget panel because it would cost the state $2.2 million in 2005-07 and $3.3 million in 2007-09.

Rep. Terry Beyer of Springfield was one of two Democrats who joined with all four Republicans on the agriculture panel Wednesday in passing the hunting bill, despite misgivings about the surprise tactics.

"I am firmly of the opinion we have a problem with cougars," Beyer said. "They are moving in to the populated areas or the populated areas are moving out to them."

---

Information from: The Register-Guard, http://www.registerguard.com
Tags »
Previous
Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

Astute reader wrote on Nov 30, 2006 12:57 PM:

Wilderness areas have no place in a country like the USA. Wilderness areas are a communist concept that are more appropriate for communist countries.


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections