Senate panel OKs defense spending bill

By Siobhan McDonough, Associated Press Writer
Monday, May 16, 2005 | 5 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
WASHINGTON - A Senate committee approved a $441.6 billion defense bill for fiscal 2006 that envisions spending an additional $50 billion next year for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

"Our forces serving around the world are truly the first line of defense in the security of our homeland, and they deserve our strongest support," Sen. John Warner of Virginia, chairman of the Armed Services Committee, said after the authorization bill passed on Friday.

"This bill provides our men and women in uniform and their families, the resources and authorities they need to successfully carry out their missions."

The bill:

€ Adds $1.4 billion over the president's budget request for force protection gear for service members.

€ Authorizes $109.2 billion for military personnel, including costs of pay, allowances, bonuses, death benefits and permanent change of station moves.

€ Authorizes the budget request of $3.4 billion for the Future Combat Systems program, including $231.6 million for the Non-line of Sight Launch System and $107.6 million for the Non-line of Sight Cannon.

€ Authorizes $344.2 million for up-armored high mobility multipurpose wheeled vehicles and wheeled vehicle add-on ballistic protection to provide force protection for soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The bill also authorizes $878.4 million for 240 Stryker vehicles. Critics of the Army's Stryker troop-carrying vehicle say it inadequately protects soldiers.

Congress had approved on Tuesday an additional $82 billion for war in Iraq and Afghanistan and to combat terror worldwide, boosting the cost of the global effort since 2001 to more than $300 billion.

The Senate approved the measure unanimously, 100-0. Earlier, the House of Representatives easily approved the measure. It now goes to President Bush for his signature, which is certain.

That bill includes sweeping immigration changes, a nearly tenfold increase in the one-time payment for families of troops killed in combat and money to build a sprawling U.S. Embassy in Baghdad, Iraq's capital.

Most of the money - $75.9 billion - is for military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, while $4.2 billion goes to foreign aid and other international relations programs.
Tags »
Previous
Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

smiley 42 wrote on Oct 23, 2008 11:17 AM:

who cares

NB Resident wrote on Aug 4, 2008 6:48 PM:

Let's start replacing our good ole boys (ELECTED OFFICIALS) as well.

Craig wrote on Jul 14, 2008 4:13 PM:

finally now this is good. what would be better is if we could vote someone from the working families party

Arrgy wrote on Jun 5, 2008 7:45 AM:

Replacing the corrupt with the corrupt. Oh goody! What a party!

Just An Observer wrote on Oct 24, 2006 3:42 PM:

ENRON was Bush's biggest campaign contributor in the 2000 election. It figures! Birds of a feather and all that...


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections