Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Senate passes birth control coverage requirement bill
By Niki Sullivan, Associated Press Writer
Thursday, March 24, 2005 | 1 comment(s)
SALEM - A bill that would give more women insurance coverage for prescription birth control won Senate approval Wednesday despite arguments by Republican lawmakers that the measure is unnecessary and would be too expensive.
Senate Majority Leader Kate Brown, D-Portland, the bill's chief sponsor, said that requiring insurance companies to cover prescription birth control at the same level as other prescription medicines is an "issue of basic fairness and equity."
The bill passed 20-7, with most Republicans opposed. The measure goes to the Republican-controlled House, where similar bills have failed in previous sessions.
A similar bill pending in House this session has not yet been discussed.
Brown also said it will bring the state in line with a federal ruling in 2000, which said employers who did not cover contraceptives were violating federal civil rights laws.
The bill's foes say the federal ruling makes Oregon's bill unneeded because anyone with insurance who wants prescription contraception coverage already has legal ground to demand it.
"Those who do not have it are those who request not to have it," said Sen. Jeff Kruse, R-Roseburg, of women who do not currently have prescription contraceptives covered.
"We're better off just staying with the federal policy," Kruse said.
About 50 percent of insurance companies cover birth control in Oregon, according to a 2001 study of more than 1,700 women by the state Department of Human Services.
Brown said current state law puts Oregon businesses in a "legal quagmire" because it allows businesses to purchase insurance plans without knowing they may be violating federal policy.
Sen. Alan Bates, D-Ashland, said that the bill would protect businesses from being sued in federal court by employees who do not receive birth control coverage.
Bates, a doctor, also said he frequently sees women patients who do not have coverage for prescription contraception, and it's difficult to explain why vasectomies for men, or more complicated birth-control procedures, are covered while pills are not.
Senate Majority Leader Kate Brown, D-Portland, the bill's chief sponsor, said that requiring insurance companies to cover prescription birth control at the same level as other prescription medicines is an "issue of basic fairness and equity."
The bill passed 20-7, with most Republicans opposed. The measure goes to the Republican-controlled House, where similar bills have failed in previous sessions.
A similar bill pending in House this session has not yet been discussed.
Brown also said it will bring the state in line with a federal ruling in 2000, which said employers who did not cover contraceptives were violating federal civil rights laws.
The bill's foes say the federal ruling makes Oregon's bill unneeded because anyone with insurance who wants prescription contraception coverage already has legal ground to demand it.
"Those who do not have it are those who request not to have it," said Sen. Jeff Kruse, R-Roseburg, of women who do not currently have prescription contraceptives covered.
"We're better off just staying with the federal policy," Kruse said.
About 50 percent of insurance companies cover birth control in Oregon, according to a 2001 study of more than 1,700 women by the state Department of Human Services.
Brown said current state law puts Oregon businesses in a "legal quagmire" because it allows businesses to purchase insurance plans without knowing they may be violating federal policy.
Sen. Alan Bates, D-Ashland, said that the bill would protect businesses from being sued in federal court by employees who do not receive birth control coverage.
Bates, a doctor, also said he frequently sees women patients who do not have coverage for prescription contraception, and it's difficult to explain why vasectomies for men, or more complicated birth-control procedures, are covered while pills are not.
The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines
Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Not already registered?
The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.
Please follow these basic rules:
- No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
- No deliberately false information.
- No obscenity or racially offensive language.
- No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
- No information that invades another person's privacy.
- No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.
The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.
Close Guidelines