Medication discount cards go into effect


Wednesday, March 02, 2005 | 2 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
SALEM (AP) - A new state program designed to help Oregon's seniors save money on prescription drugs began this week.

Discount cards were mailed out to about 1,200 older Oregonians who have signed up, but 100 times that number are eligible to participate in the program.

To qualify, a person must be 54 or older with income up to 185 percent of the federal poverty level. For a single person, that's $1,435 a month; for a married couple, it's $1,925 a month.

The discount card, which is free, allows seniors to purchase their prescription drugs at negotiated discount prices from participating pharmacies. About 400 pharmacies, including most of the major chains and two mail-order pharmacies, are participating, said Missy Dolan, the program administrator.

Generic drugs get deeper discounts, some up to 60 percent; brand-name drugs are discounted about 15 percent, she said.

Unlike the Medicare drug discount program, the state's discount program is free, and it can be used for any drug, Dolan said. But the state program can be used in conjunction with the Medicare discount drug cards.

The state also is preparing to sign up public sector groups for the program, Dolan said - about 400,000 public employees are eligible.

As those employee groups join, the state's negotiating power will increase, said Maribeth Healey, executive director of Oregonians for Health Security.

Healey said she's hoping the Legislature will expand eligibility to include, for example, uninsured Oregonians as well as private sector employee groups.

Sen. Bill Morrisette, D-Springfield, has introduced such legislation in the current session, SB 329 and SB 505.

---

Information from: The Register-Guard, http://www.registerguard.com
Tags »
Previous
Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

Bingo wrote on Aug 13, 2009 7:32 PM:

"Before recording the ad, French signed an affidavit that said: 'I am able to swear, as I do hereby swear, that all facts and statements contained in this affidavit are true and correct and within my personal knowledge and belief.'"

Andrew Kramer, AP, August 24, 2004

Just for the historical record, of all the shoddy attacks leveled at the Swiftvets, this article represents, perhaps, "journalism" at its worst.

Andrew Kramer of the AP either malevolently or ignorantly misquotes Al French's affidavit. The actual quote from the affidavit reads...

"I am able to swear, as I do hereby swear, that all facts and statements contained in this affidavit are true and correct and within my personal knowledge OR belief."

http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/tonysnow_vetaffadavit.pdf (see exhibit 2)

That single, misquoted word was foundational to the specious allegation that Mr. French "lied" in his affidavit...since he acknowledged other than first-hand knowledge in support of his sworn testimony. Mr. French's actual words rendered that allegation moot. Nor was Mr. Kramer unique in his shoddy reporting...

http://www.kgw.com/news-local/stories/kgw_082304_news_french_protest.a701071e.html#

Samuel A. Mullen-Perron wrote on Jul 14, 2007 8:14 PM:

Is this suppose to be a surprise to everyone? If it is then I am flabergasted because all we need to do is look that the polls. The Ironic think about this is supposidly over 50% of the votes were in favor of Bush during the 2004 election. As Connie Frances sang sometime ago; Who's Sorry Now?!?!?


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections