Some voters wary of Bush conservatism

By Brad Cain, Associated Press Writer
Thursday, November 04, 2004 | 2 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
PORTLAND - An aggressive get-out-the-vote drive by pro-John Kerry groups coupled with the distaste a lot of Oregonians have for President Bush's faith-based conservatism helped Kerry make a stronger showing in Oregon than fellow Democrat Al Gore did in 2000, observers say.

Kerry defeated Bush by nearly 70,000 votes in Oregon's election Tuesday, well above the 6,675-vote margin by which Gore barely beat Bush four years ago.

A key factor in Kerry's showing was an unprecedented effort by unions and independent groups supporting Kerry. They signed up more than 150,000 new Democratic voters for the election.

"We're very proud of what we accomplished here in Oregon," said Tim Nesbitt, president of the Oregon AFL-CIO.

The 51 percent to 47 percent margin by which Kerry defeated Bush in Oregon was similar to Kerry's margin in Washington state, Portland pollster Tim Hibbitts noted.

Voters in the Northwest and Oregon in particular "have never been terribly enthusiastic about the Bush administration," Hibbitts said.

"Bush's cultural conservatism is more to the political right than a lot of Oregonians would prefer," he said. "The president clearly won nationally because of his support from the faith-based community, and that factor is not as strong here in Oregon."

Another difference from the 2000 election is that consumer activist Ralph Nader failed to qualify for Oregon's ballot this year, meaning that Kerry didn't have an independent siphoning voters from him.

Nader drew 5 percent of the Oregon vote in 2000, which many Democrats say came mostly at Gore's expense, although Hibbitts contends that most of those people wouldn't have voted for Gore or Bush in any case.

Further, Hibbitts said his own polling indicated that Nader would have drawn less than 1 percent of the vote even if he had qualified for Oregon's ballot this year.

A statewide poll for The Associated Press showed that Oregon's struggling economy was a key factor in Bush's defeat in the state Tuesday. The poll found that Kerry was favored by voters who felt Oregon's economy was doing badly, and they outnumbered the optimists nearly 3-to-1.

Oregon has been saddled with worst-in-the-nation unemployment rates throughout much of Bush's first term.

Of course, Ohio voters on Tuesday overlooked the loss of 280,000 jobs in their state as they delivered Ohio's crucial electoral votes to Bush to give the Republican president a second term.

But Nesbitt, the AFL-CIO president, said Ohio is a more politically conservative state than Oregon, and that Oregonians weren't as willing to look past the state's economic problems as they voted for president.

Bush came close to winning Oregon in 2000 by selling himself to the state's Democratic-leaning swing voters as a "uniter, not a divider," and a "compassionate conservative."

But Democratic U.S. Sen. Ron Wyden said the Bush administration has alienated moderate voters in Oregon with such moves as trying to overturn Oregon's assisted suicide law, which has twice been endorsed by voters.

"This administration puts its ideology over the vote of the people in Oregon," the senator said.

While Bush lost in traditionally Democratic Oregon for the second time on Tuesday, his supporters said there still was strategic value in having Bush compete for Oregon's seven electoral votes.

"Every day and every dollar Kerry had to spend in Oregon, was a day and a dollar that he couldn't spend in states like Ohio and Florida," said Republican U.S. Sen. Gordon Smith.
Tags »
Previous
Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

Bingo wrote on Aug 13, 2009 7:32 PM:

"Before recording the ad, French signed an affidavit that said: 'I am able to swear, as I do hereby swear, that all facts and statements contained in this affidavit are true and correct and within my personal knowledge and belief.'"

Andrew Kramer, AP, August 24, 2004

Just for the historical record, of all the shoddy attacks leveled at the Swiftvets, this article represents, perhaps, "journalism" at its worst.

Andrew Kramer of the AP either malevolently or ignorantly misquotes Al French's affidavit. The actual quote from the affidavit reads...

"I am able to swear, as I do hereby swear, that all facts and statements contained in this affidavit are true and correct and within my personal knowledge OR belief."

http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/tonysnow_vetaffadavit.pdf (see exhibit 2)

That single, misquoted word was foundational to the specious allegation that Mr. French "lied" in his affidavit...since he acknowledged other than first-hand knowledge in support of his sworn testimony. Mr. French's actual words rendered that allegation moot. Nor was Mr. Kramer unique in his shoddy reporting...

http://www.kgw.com/news-local/stories/kgw_082304_news_french_protest.a701071e.html#

Samuel A. Mullen-Perron wrote on Jul 14, 2007 8:14 PM:

Is this suppose to be a surprise to everyone? If it is then I am flabergasted because all we need to do is look that the polls. The Ironic think about this is supposidly over 50% of the votes were in favor of Bush during the 2004 election. As Connie Frances sang sometime ago; Who's Sorry Now?!?!?


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections