Oregon pursues feds' OK on drug imports

By Sarah Linn, Associated Press Writer
Friday, August 20, 2004 | 2 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
PORTLAND - Gov. Ted Kulongoski on Thursday asked the federal government to give Oregonians access to affordable prescription drugs from Canada.

Kulongoski said he sent a letter to U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy Thompson, requesting a federal waiver to allow Oregon to import the drugs.

"With health care costs escalating, far too many Oregonians - especially seniors - are unable to afford the medications they need," Kulongoski told a dozen seniors at the Rosewood Family Health Center in Portland. "No Oregonian should have to choose between paying for food, shelter or their medication."

Kulongoski said Oregon already has the tools in place to import high-quality, low-cost prescription drugs from Canada. He called on the federal government to respond within 30 days.

Also Thursday, the governor announced the Pioneer Prescription Drug Project, aimed at giving Oregonians access to Canadian drugs through their local pharmacies.

The proposal comes after the governor's announcement in May that he was working with the state Board of Pharmacy to develop a plan to ensure the safety and affordability of imported drugs.

Under the proposal, Oregon pharmacists would only be allowed to import products approved by the Board of Pharmacy and supplied by approved Canadian wholesalers. The board would license and inspect the Canadian pharmaceutical companies to ensure they meet the same safety standards required of U.S. wholesalers.

The Pioneer Project would only cover drugs that cost substantially more in the United States, with a focus on brand-name medications, Kulongoski said. That list would include 50 to 60 drugs.

Oregon is the first state to limit its proposal to local pharmacies and Canadian wholesalers, and the first to follow new Medicare guidelines, said Gary Schnabel, executive director of the state Board of Pharmacy.

In doing so, Oregon hopes to succeed where other states failed. The Food and Drug Administration has repeatedly denied requests to import drugs from Canada, prompting Vermont to file a lawsuit against the federal agency.

Kulongoski said Oregon may also file suit if its waiver is denied. Or it could follow the leads of Illinois, Minnesota and other states by creating an online clearinghouse of overseas pharmacies where residents can purchase drugs.

"There is an importation program in place, but it isn't endorsed by the United States government," he said, noting many Americans now order prescription drugs over the Internet or even cross U.S. borders to buy cheaper medications.

Robert Kennedy, 77, and his 74-year-old wife, Arlene, usually stop by Mexico to buy prescription drugs when they winter in Yuma, Ariz., they said after the governor's speech.

Arlene Kennedy said the couple saves 50 percent or so. Fosamax, an osteoporosis medication that costs more than $50 in the United States, goes for $27.99 in Mexico, she said.

Schnabel said state pharmacy board and other government agencies have long frowned on foreign drugs as less safe as their American counterparts.

"Canadian drugs aren't bad. We know that people aren't dropping dead in Canada," Schnabel said. "The problem is the distribution."

He said there has been ample evidence of Canadian companies selling drugs manufactured outside of Canada, where production standards may be more lax.

The Pioneer Project would ensure that the prescription drugs being sold to Oregonians were made in the United States or Canada, he said.

If the federal waiver is approved, Oregon pharmacies could be doling out Canadian drugs in three to four months, said Dr. Bruce Goldberg, who heads the Office for Oregon Health Policy and Research.
Tags »
Previous
Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

Bingo wrote on Aug 13, 2009 7:32 PM:

"Before recording the ad, French signed an affidavit that said: 'I am able to swear, as I do hereby swear, that all facts and statements contained in this affidavit are true and correct and within my personal knowledge and belief.'"

Andrew Kramer, AP, August 24, 2004

Just for the historical record, of all the shoddy attacks leveled at the Swiftvets, this article represents, perhaps, "journalism" at its worst.

Andrew Kramer of the AP either malevolently or ignorantly misquotes Al French's affidavit. The actual quote from the affidavit reads...

"I am able to swear, as I do hereby swear, that all facts and statements contained in this affidavit are true and correct and within my personal knowledge OR belief."

http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/tonysnow_vetaffadavit.pdf (see exhibit 2)

That single, misquoted word was foundational to the specious allegation that Mr. French "lied" in his affidavit...since he acknowledged other than first-hand knowledge in support of his sworn testimony. Mr. French's actual words rendered that allegation moot. Nor was Mr. Kramer unique in his shoddy reporting...

http://www.kgw.com/news-local/stories/kgw_082304_news_french_protest.a701071e.html#

Samuel A. Mullen-Perron wrote on Jul 14, 2007 8:14 PM:

Is this suppose to be a surprise to everyone? If it is then I am flabergasted because all we need to do is look that the polls. The Ironic think about this is supposidly over 50% of the votes were in favor of Bush during the 2004 election. As Connie Frances sang sometime ago; Who's Sorry Now?!?!?


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections