Agency responds to critics
By Katherine Pfleger Shrader, Associated Press Writer
Friday, July 23, 2004 |
WASHINGTON - In an attempt to rebut a rash of criticism in recent weeks from commissions detailing intelligence failures, the CIA fired off a strong rebuttal of the Sept. 11 commission's finding that the intelligence community assembled an insufficient counterattack to the al-Qaida threat.
It is rare for the CIA to bring roughly 40 reporters into its headquarters to talk about current events.
But responding to the Sept. 11 commission report's varied criticisms, a senior CIA official briefed that many reporters this week, acknowledging the agency was unable to determine the time, place and method of attack on Sept. 11, 2001, or to capture mastermind Khalid Shaikh Mohammed before he planned and managed the strike.
But, the official said, speaking on the condition of anonymity, that the agency had regularly reported on threats to civil aviation, despite implications otherwise in the report, and had told Presidents Clinton and Bush that Osama bin Laden was a danger.
The official also rebuffed suggestions that the CIA did not share information with the FBI or State Department about two of the hijackers who ultimately crashed into the Pentagon.
This month, acting CIA Director John McLaughlin spoke out publicly about the Senate Intelligence Committee's highly critical report on the intelligence that led to the invasion of Iraq. Then, he acknowledged mistakes, but said the intelligence community is making changes to prevent similar situations.
Some of the Sept. 11 commission's reforms would mean sweeping changes for the intelligence community. The report calls for creating a new Cabinet-level head of the 15-agency intelligence community, rather than leaving the CIA director as the top custodian.
It also says the CIA director should improve analytic capabilities, develop a better language program and improve human intelligence gathering. And, it says that clandestine and covert paramilitary operations should be directed and executed by the Defense Department, because the U.S. can't afford to build two separate capabilities for carrying out secret military operations.
Tags »
Embed This Article
Feel free to embed this article onto your website by copying the
code below and pasting it into your site's HTML.
The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines
Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Not already registered?
The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.
Please follow these basic rules:
- No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
- No deliberately false information.
- No obscenity or racially offensive language.
- No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
- No information that invades another person's privacy.
- No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.
The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.
Close Guidelines