Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
White House gives up on effort to rewrite wetlands regulations
By John Heilprin, Associated Press Writer
Wednesday, December 17, 2003 | 2 comment(s)
WASHINGTON - President Bush is abandoning a plan that could have further reduced wetlands protections even though his administration has said their occasional use by farmers, migratory birds or endangered species isn't reason enough to stop developers from filling them in.
Mike Leavitt, the new administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, said Tuesday that Bush personally made the decision "not to issue a rule that could reduce" further wetlands protections under the Clean Water Act.
Leavitt said the administration wants to avoid "a contentious and lengthy rule-making debate" over disputed environmental benefits or losses by putting into force advisory guidelines issued in January.
The administration recognizes the ecological value of remaining wetlands that function as "nature's kidneys" by filtering pollutants, Leavitt said, explaining Bush's decision to drop a formal rule-making process since then.
The Supreme Court ruled in 2001 in a Chicago-area case that isolated ponds and mudflats should not be afforded Clean Water Act protections if only to provide habitat for migratory birds.
The EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers issued the January guidelines for carrying out the court's decision. Environmentalists said those guidelines went beyond the court ruling by adding "endangered species" and "crop irrigation" as insufficient grounds for protecting wetlands, isolated streams, ponds and marshes that don't cross state lines.
At the same time, the administration began crafting new regulations specifically to exclude isolated ponds and streams, many of them dry for part of the year, as protected wetlands under the law.
Chandler Morse, a policy analyst for the National Association of Home Builders, said the guidelines have created even more inconsistency and unpredictability on whether developers must get permits from the Corps of Engineers before filling isolated wetlands.
"Not moving ahead with the rule making is going to leave the problems around," he said. "There just isn't a lot of information on what this all means."
Last month, 218 House members, including 26 Republicans, independent Rep. Bernie Sanders of Vermont and all but 14 of the House's 205 Democrats, signed a letter to Bush urging him to scrap what they called an attempt "to remove federal protection from waters ... that have been covered by the Clean Water Act for decades."
EPA has estimated as much one-fifth of the current 100 million acres of wetlands in the United States, a full 20 million acres, could be considered isolated. Other Bush administration officials have put that figure at as low as 45,000 acres.
"We're happy that they've decided not to go forward," said Malia Hale, a water policy specialist at the Nation-al Wildlife Federation. "However, the guidance still stands out there."
Tracy Mehan, who oversees the EPA Office of Water, said the Supreme Court's decision and guidelines implementing it have had little impact on wetlands so far.
---
On the Net:
EPA Office of Water: http://www.epa.gov/OW/index.html
National Wildlife Federation: http://www.nwf.org/news
National Association of Homebuilders: http://www.nahb.org
Mike Leavitt, the new administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, said Tuesday that Bush personally made the decision "not to issue a rule that could reduce" further wetlands protections under the Clean Water Act.
Leavitt said the administration wants to avoid "a contentious and lengthy rule-making debate" over disputed environmental benefits or losses by putting into force advisory guidelines issued in January.
The administration recognizes the ecological value of remaining wetlands that function as "nature's kidneys" by filtering pollutants, Leavitt said, explaining Bush's decision to drop a formal rule-making process since then.
The Supreme Court ruled in 2001 in a Chicago-area case that isolated ponds and mudflats should not be afforded Clean Water Act protections if only to provide habitat for migratory birds.
The EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers issued the January guidelines for carrying out the court's decision. Environmentalists said those guidelines went beyond the court ruling by adding "endangered species" and "crop irrigation" as insufficient grounds for protecting wetlands, isolated streams, ponds and marshes that don't cross state lines.
At the same time, the administration began crafting new regulations specifically to exclude isolated ponds and streams, many of them dry for part of the year, as protected wetlands under the law.
Chandler Morse, a policy analyst for the National Association of Home Builders, said the guidelines have created even more inconsistency and unpredictability on whether developers must get permits from the Corps of Engineers before filling isolated wetlands.
"Not moving ahead with the rule making is going to leave the problems around," he said. "There just isn't a lot of information on what this all means."
Last month, 218 House members, including 26 Republicans, independent Rep. Bernie Sanders of Vermont and all but 14 of the House's 205 Democrats, signed a letter to Bush urging him to scrap what they called an attempt "to remove federal protection from waters ... that have been covered by the Clean Water Act for decades."
EPA has estimated as much one-fifth of the current 100 million acres of wetlands in the United States, a full 20 million acres, could be considered isolated. Other Bush administration officials have put that figure at as low as 45,000 acres.
"We're happy that they've decided not to go forward," said Malia Hale, a water policy specialist at the Nation-al Wildlife Federation. "However, the guidance still stands out there."
Tracy Mehan, who oversees the EPA Office of Water, said the Supreme Court's decision and guidelines implementing it have had little impact on wetlands so far.
---
On the Net:
EPA Office of Water: http://www.epa.gov/OW/index.html
National Wildlife Federation: http://www.nwf.org/news
National Association of Homebuilders: http://www.nahb.org
The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines
Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Not already registered?
The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.
Please follow these basic rules:
- No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
- No deliberately false information.
- No obscenity or racially offensive language.
- No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
- No information that invades another person's privacy.
- No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.
The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.
Close Guidelines