Group steps toward port development

By Andrew Sirocchi, Staff Writer
Friday, November 14, 2003 | 3 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
An organizing committee created to develop goals and funding for a possible future maritime commerce task force may itself become the advisory body that will recommend actions to revitalize the industrial waterfront to the Oregon International Port of Coos Bay.

Meeting for the third time Thursday afternoon, the five-member committee discussed keeping the task force small and more functional rather than delegating advisory authority to more than 10 industry representatives.

Under an organizational structure developed by the members, the task force would include the port general manager, one port commissioner and three industry representatives. It also would enlist the help of port staff to record meeting minutes or other specialized needs.

"I don't see our group having a structured staff other than the people in this room," said committee member John Knutson, owner of Knutson Towboat Company.

Port General Manager Allan Rumbaugh said the port would arrange to have staff time allocated for the task force but that the group would have to pay for any special staffing requirements out of its own budget, if the commissioners agree to provide the group with funding.

Commissioner Ingvar Doessing said the task force should keep in close contact with the industry representatives to leverage their experience in the business. He also said the group's current membership should remain the same in order to provide continuity to its economic development efforts.

"Right now, the issue is so important that the people who are here are the people who should carry it for a long, long time," Doessing said.

The task force met for months as an independent organization of private business representatives. Members said they want the port commission to shuffle its priorities and make maritime commerce the port's primary focus.

In a September letter addressed to the commissioners, the group's members asked the port to legitimize the task force by sanctioning the members as an official advisory committee. They also asked the port to allow the group to develop a strategic plan to increase maritime commerce opportunities in Coos Bay.

Instead, the Board of Commissioners created an organizing committee and charged it with justifying the creation of a port-sanctioned maritime commerce advisory committee. They also asked the group to establish the committee's budget and determining its staffing needs.

The task force represents a first for the local area, a partnership between local industry representatives and the port, something that both sides said has been missing in years past.

In other action on Thursday the committee:

n discussed possible ways to handle economic development leads and how to share the information between the port and the task force. Committee member Jim Lyons, owner of Ocean Terminals, said the port already has an established way of handling business leads and that the maritime commerce committee should recognize that methodology and work to augment it rather than supplant it.

n began preliminary discussions on funding. Fiscal needs were not determined although the committee discussed asking the port to allocate enough money to help pay for one dedicated maritime commerce expert. Preliminary funding needs will be debated at the committee's next meeting on Thursday, Nov. 20.

The group has struggled to determine its funding needs because there has been no prior spending history. Moderator Ron Opitz stressed that the group will need to come up with an accounting method to determine how and where its funds will be spent.

"If this is a legitimate group, it should be an accountable group," Opitz said.

The committee is expected to make a recommendation to port commissioners by February that will include the group's funding needs and its staffing requirements.
Tags »
Previous
Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

OCAPA wrote on Aug 6, 2007 9:37 AM:

Although it is terrible that the tragedy in MN had to happen, it's refreshing to hear that Gov. Kulongoski is going forward with suggestions from the Oregon Concrete and Aggregate industries. The concrete and cement people have been yelling about the importance of these inspections and maintenance of bridges for years.

Pancho wrote on Jul 15, 2007 12:58 PM:

My kids are illegal, can we still get free lunch?

Just An Observer wrote on Nov 29, 2006 5:05 PM:

We need all the hydro power we can get. It's non-polluting and doesn't result in any global warming increase. If needed, rebuild the dams to be as fish friendly as possible but don't cut the flow of juice. Our nation's increasing demand for electricity means we need to keep in place all the hydro we can, otherwise we'll have to build even more polluting power stations or deal with even more nuclear waste that no state wants as we head toward building more nuclear plants. Sometimes choosing what is needed isn't easy but aquaculture can breed a lot more fish to make up for Klamath salmon runs being down much easier than we can build more power plants.


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections