State creates new air quality rules

By The Associated Press
Friday, October 10, 2003 | 2 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font |
PORTLAND - State officials have voted to create new air quality control rules that will focus squarely on chemicals considered most harmful to people's health, such as arsenic, benzene and chromium.

This is a change from the past, when rules focused more on "ambient air quality standards" set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Those emphasized large industrial sources with less regard to the number of people nearby and likely to breathe the chemicals.

"This is kind of a turning point for us, in really focusing on toxic air pollution," said Andy Ginsburg, head of the Department of Environmental Quality's Air Quality Division. "This is the first program that's like this anywhere in the country."

Commissioners unanimously approved the Oregon Air Toxics Program on Thursday during the first day of a two-day meeting in John Day.

By 2005, the DEQ aims to create a list of pollutants to monitor, and by 2006, agency leaders hope to get a plan to limit these chemicals in the Portland region.

Cities likely to be targeted after Portland include Medford, Salem, La Grande, McMinnville, Baker City, Eugene and Springfield, Albany and Millersburg, and Klamath Falls.

Some people have questioned whether there is evidence that Oregon's air is dirty enough to need this program, which federal officials have encouraged but not required.

Several environmental and business groups favor the new plan, however.

"It took a long time, but we like the finished product," said John Ledger, a policy representative with Associated Oregon Industries who gave the state feedback on the plan.

Ledger said he likes the plan's focus on finding where pollution is affecting people, not just what is being released into the air.

He added that lots of emissions, especially from businesses, are already regulated by the federal government, so the state plan might not cause many industrial changes.

Instead, he said, it is more likely to hit smaller sources that, combined, add more to the overall pollution problem, such as vehicle engines.

A few state residents have voiced worries about the plan.

"It kind of caught me off guard that they were even proposing this," said Grant Darrow, a stove seller and chimney sweep in Elgin. Part of his concern, he said, is a lack of tests showing high levels of chemical pollutants in areas other than Portland.

The Environmental Protection Agency's most recent estimates, in 2002, in part of Oregon showed that 16 pollutants exceed federal goals, including benzene, chromium, diesel particles and formaldehyde.

The three-county Portland area had the worst problem in those tests.
Tags »
Previous Email this story to yourself or a friend Print this story Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

sabrina chapmen wrote on Nov 8, 2008 2:53 PM:

it is difficult to know and understand that this is happening and i would like to know what else i could do to help...please if there is anyway post it on this site and i will personaly check it every day to see what i could do to help...thank you

Polly Parks wrote on Feb 13, 2007 5:37 AM:

The oral ad is highly offensive.


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections