Legislative panel trying another 'kicker' revision

By Charles E. Beggs, Associated Press Writer
Tuesday, August 12, 2003 | 2 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
SALEM - A Senate panel, trying to spur House action on a proposal to build a reserve with unexpected state revenue instead of returning it to taxpayers, approved a second version of the measure Monday.

The move was the only formal action on budget-related issues Monday.

The Senate in June passed a proposed ballot measure that would revise the so-called kicker law. It has since languished in a House committee.

Sen. Ryan Deckert, D-Beaverton, said Senate backers of the idea crafted a slightly different version as part of a bipartisan revenue-raising package that was announced by Senate leaders on Friday.

Hearings on the package, which includes abut $800 million in tax increases, tentatively were to begin Tuesday, Deckert said.

The Senate proposal includes $1.4 billion in new revenue, on top of the $10.4 billion already available, compared with almost $1.2 billion in added revenue in a House-passed plan.

The new version, Senate Joint Resolution 18, now goes to the full Senate. It's almost identical to the earlier measure except it would be on the ballot in the May 2004 primary election instead of the November general election.

The 1979 kicker law says when revenue at the end of a two-year budget period is at least 2 percent higher than what state economists had forecast, the refund requirement "kicks" in and all the surplus must be returned to taxpayers.

Because voters put the kicker law in the state constitution in 2000, it can't be changed without voter approval.

Critics say the law prevents the state from building a reserve to help in difficult times like the budget crisis the state has faced the past two years.

The proposed ballot measure would funnel any money more than 1 percent above the forecast figure into a rainy day fund until the reserves equaled 10 percent of the budget. That would amount to about $1.1 billion under current figures.

Once the 10 percent threshold was reached, any extra revenue would go back to taxpayers.

A competing proposal being considered by a House panel would allow income tax revenue to increase by 5 percent from one two-year budget period to the next.

When revenue topped that amount, 40 percent would go back to taxpayers, 40 percent would be put in a rainy-day fund and 20 percent would be kept in the general budget for education and other state programs.

---

On The Net:

Senate Joint Resolution 18, House Joint Resolution 54

www.leg.state.or.us
Tags »
Previous
Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

Bingo wrote on Aug 13, 2009 7:32 PM:

"Before recording the ad, French signed an affidavit that said: 'I am able to swear, as I do hereby swear, that all facts and statements contained in this affidavit are true and correct and within my personal knowledge and belief.'"

Andrew Kramer, AP, August 24, 2004

Just for the historical record, of all the shoddy attacks leveled at the Swiftvets, this article represents, perhaps, "journalism" at its worst.

Andrew Kramer of the AP either malevolently or ignorantly misquotes Al French's affidavit. The actual quote from the affidavit reads...

"I am able to swear, as I do hereby swear, that all facts and statements contained in this affidavit are true and correct and within my personal knowledge OR belief."

http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/tonysnow_vetaffadavit.pdf (see exhibit 2)

That single, misquoted word was foundational to the specious allegation that Mr. French "lied" in his affidavit...since he acknowledged other than first-hand knowledge in support of his sworn testimony. Mr. French's actual words rendered that allegation moot. Nor was Mr. Kramer unique in his shoddy reporting...

http://www.kgw.com/news-local/stories/kgw_082304_news_french_protest.a701071e.html#

Samuel A. Mullen-Perron wrote on Jul 14, 2007 8:14 PM:

Is this suppose to be a surprise to everyone? If it is then I am flabergasted because all we need to do is look that the polls. The Ironic think about this is supposidly over 50% of the votes were in favor of Bush during the 2004 election. As Connie Frances sang sometime ago; Who's Sorry Now?!?!?


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections