Feds propose change to roadless rule

By Matthew Daly, Associated Press Writer
Tuesday, June 10, 2003 | 3 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
Buy this photo
Previous Next
Photo 1 of 1
WASHINGTON - The Bush administration said Monday it will propose a rule change allowing governors to seek exemptions from a policy blocking road-building in remote areas of national forests.

The plan to amend the so-called roadless rule - adopted in the final days of the Clinton administration - comes just five days after a top official had said the administration would let the rule stand.

Agriculture Undersecretary Mark Rey said the proposed change would allow states to play a greater role in land-use decisions that affect them.

The roadless rule, which blocks development on 58 million acres of federal land, "is the law of the land,"' Rey said, "but we will leave it up to the governors to see where on a limited basis relief might be appropriate."

Critics called the plan a giveaway to the timber industry, noting that Republican governors in many Western states have long opposed the roadless rule. Several states, including Idaho and Utah, have challenged the rule in court and are likely to seek exemptions from the rule, environmentalists said.

"It's an outrageous and transparent effort to let someone else take the heat for advancing the administration's anti-environment agenda," said Niel Lawrence, an attorney for the Natural Resources Defense Council.

Mike Anderson of The Wilderness Society called the announcement "a total undermining of the roadless rule," adding that it was "a pretty shocking reversal" from a statement Rey made last week.

Rey told reporters June 4 that a temporary rule allowing some exceptions to the roadless rule will not be renewed when it expires June 14. The decision effectively reinstated the Clinton-era rule, which blocks development on a third of federal forests, Rey said.

But in a surprise announcement Monday, Rey said the roadless rule will be amended this fall to allow exemptions for individual states.

Rey also said the administration had settled a lawsuit filed by Alaska challenging the road-building ban. As part of the settlement, the administration has agreed to exempt the Tongass and Chugach national forests from the revised roadless rule, Rey said.

As a practical matter, 95 percent of roadless areas in the two national forests would remain roadless, Rey said. Only 300,000 acres in the Tongass would be affected by the new policy, he said.

In a teleconference with reporters, Rey said the proposal was not an attempt to cede federal control of public lands to the states.

"These are federal lands (and) federal resources," he said. "We have an obligation to protect them. At the same time we have always welcomed the cooperative participation of state governments that have the broadest possible support."

Philip Clapp, president of the National Environmental Trust, an advocacy group that supports the roadless rule, said the administration was hiding behind Republican governors in states such as Idaho, Utah and Montana, who oppose the roadless rule. Many Western governors "will undoubtedly petition to exempt roadless areas in their states from protection," Clapp said.

Though Rey and other officials have said they support the principles behind the rule, the administration declined to defend it in court. That led environmental groups to intervene in an Idaho case brought by the Boise Cascade Corp. and a coalition of Western logging and snowmobiling interests.

A divided 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the rule in December, saying the Forest Service had met all the legal requirements in developing the road ban, which covers nearly a third of the nation's forests.

Congressional supporters of the roadless rule have sponsored legislation that would give the Clinton-era rule the force of law.

---

On the Net:

Forest Service background on roadless rule: http://www.roadless.fs.fed.us/
Tags »
Previous
Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

OCAPA wrote on Aug 6, 2007 9:37 AM:

Although it is terrible that the tragedy in MN had to happen, it's refreshing to hear that Gov. Kulongoski is going forward with suggestions from the Oregon Concrete and Aggregate industries. The concrete and cement people have been yelling about the importance of these inspections and maintenance of bridges for years.

Pancho wrote on Jul 15, 2007 12:58 PM:

My kids are illegal, can we still get free lunch?

Just An Observer wrote on Nov 29, 2006 5:05 PM:

We need all the hydro power we can get. It's non-polluting and doesn't result in any global warming increase. If needed, rebuild the dams to be as fish friendly as possible but don't cut the flow of juice. Our nation's increasing demand for electricity means we need to keep in place all the hydro we can, otherwise we'll have to build even more polluting power stations or deal with even more nuclear waste that no state wants as we head toward building more nuclear plants. Sometimes choosing what is needed isn't easy but aquaculture can breed a lot more fish to make up for Klamath salmon runs being down much easier than we can build more power plants.


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections