Judge sets hearing in terror suspect's case
Font Size:
By Andrew Kramer, Associated Press Writer
Wednesday, April 30, 2003 |
Steven Houze, an attorney representing Maher Hawash, is surrounded by microphones as he talks with reporters outside the Mark O. Hatfield Federal Courthouse Tuesday in Portland. Federal authorities charged Hawash with plotting to aid al-Qaida and Taliban forces fighting U.S. soldiers a month after the 2001 terrorist attacks. Hawash, a 39-year-old software engineer, has been in custody as a material witness since late March. AP Photo
PORTLAND - Maher Hawash, a software engineer held without charges for more than a month as a material witness, appeared publicly in court for the first time Tuesday, while outside supporters said his case was an abuse of civil rights.
"Why was an American citizen who's loyal to his country held for five weeks under a veil of secrecy?" Hawash's attorney, Steven Houze, said on the courthouse steps after the hearing. "He's a nice, clean-cut fellow, a father of three children, a hard-working U.S. citizen."
Prosecutors painted Hawash differently. A 41-page affidavit unsealed Monday accuses the 39-year-old Palestinian immigrant of growing angry with America after the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, then conspiring with at least five other Muslim men to join the fight in Afghanistan against U.S. troops.
Hawash accompanied the group as it tried and failed to enter Afghanistan from western China in late fall, 2001, according to court documents.
Houze described this evidence as "sketchy and circumstantial." Supporters have said Hawash, who goes by "Mike," traveled to China in late 2001 on business.
The affidavit contends Hawash stayed in the same hotels in China with his co-conspirators, members of the so called "Portland Six.".
In court Tuesday, Hawash more closely resembled the suburban computer programmer and family man that he became after immigrating in the early 1980s than the "jihad" warrior prosecutors portray him as.
Hawash, who previously sported a bushy beard, was clean shaven and dressed in a green tweed suit jacket.
He turned and smiled at his wife, Lisa Hawash, who sat on a wooden bench in the 14th floor courtroom in the Mark O. Hatfield building. Lisa Hawash left without talking to reporters.
Hawash stood as U.S. District Judge Robert E. Jones set a preliminary hearing for Monday at 9 a.m., to be followed by a bail hearing May 8.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Charles Gorder said a grand jury will convene Friday.
Kent Robertson, chief of criminal prosecutions at the U.S. Attorney's office in Portland, declined to say why his office chose to hold Hawash secretly as a material witness before seeking an indictment. Robertson said he could not discuss whether new evidence emerged during the five-week detention.
Jones has ruled the detention was legal, but had set a deadline of last Friday for Hawash to be brought before a grand jury or released. Prosecutors presented him to the grand jury Friday, Jones said.
Hawash's arrest came more than half a year after charges were filed against the six other Portland residents. The FBI appears to have begun investigating Hawash after receiving tips from some of his neighbors, according to the affadavit.
Outside the courthouse, 50 or so friends and former co-workers waived signs of support Tuesday.
Daniel Moss, a former design engineer at Intel, held a poster that read: "Mike, We believe in your innocence."
Moss said the public hearing didn't erase the fact that Hawash was held for five weeks in solitary confinement without being charged with a crime.
Karen Herrold, another former Intel colleague, said few can picture the soft-spoken engineer who came across as more nerdy than dangerous as a supporter of terrorism and volunteer "jihad" fighter.
"Most everybody who's worked with Mike doesn't believe in this," Herrold said. "He was a good engineer and good man."
The comments above are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines
Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Samuel A. Mullen-Perron wrote on Jul 14, 2007 8:14 PM:
Is this suppose to be a surprise to everyone? If it is then I am flabergasted because all we need to do is look that the polls. The Ironic think about this is supposidly over 50% of the votes were in favor of Bush during the 2004 election. As Connie Frances sang sometime ago; Who's Sorry Now?!?!?
The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.
Please follow these basic rules:
- No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
- No deliberately false information.
- No obscenity or racially offensive language.
- No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
- No information that invades another person's privacy.
- No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.
The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.
Close Guidelines