House moves bill to extend jobless benefits

By Charles E. Beggs, Associated Press Writer
Thursday, March 27, 2003 | 2 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
SALEM - A Senate-passed measure to make about 18,000 unemployed Oregonians eligible for another 13 weeks of jobless benefits moved closer to final legislative action on Wednesday.

The House Business, Labor & Consumer Affairs Committee endorsed the bill, and the full House is expected to vote on it by early next week.

The measure would help unemployed workers who have exhausted their available benefits under various federal and state extensions of assistance. About 1,900 people are using up their benefit eligibility each month.

The measure would add a new 13-week state extension of benefits, paid for by $29 million in the unemployment trust fund that's financed by employer payroll taxes.

The spending was authorized by state lawmakers in a special session last year, but the money wasn't used because Congress extended benefits under federal law. The bill reauthorizes the funding.

The House committee chairwoman, Rep. Betsy Close, R-Albany, was criticized last week by Democrats who accused her of delaying action on the measure after the Senate passed it on March 5.

Close on Wednesday said she would speak for the measure in the House and that she had drawn jobless benefits herself in the past.

Oregon AFL-CIO President Tim Nesbitt told the committee that the "needs are quite compelling" for the bill with 150,000 Oregonians out of work.

Bob Castagna of the Oregon Catholic Conference urged approval of the extension and said lawmakers may have to again consider the issue this year if the economy doesn't improve.

"Our interest is securing a safety net and not disrupting people's lives," he said.

Oregon's unemployment rate last month was 7.3 percent, well above the 5.8 percent national average.

---

On the Net:

Bill No. SB2

www.leg.state.or.us
Tags »
Previous
Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

Bingo wrote on Aug 13, 2009 7:32 PM:

"Before recording the ad, French signed an affidavit that said: 'I am able to swear, as I do hereby swear, that all facts and statements contained in this affidavit are true and correct and within my personal knowledge and belief.'"

Andrew Kramer, AP, August 24, 2004

Just for the historical record, of all the shoddy attacks leveled at the Swiftvets, this article represents, perhaps, "journalism" at its worst.

Andrew Kramer of the AP either malevolently or ignorantly misquotes Al French's affidavit. The actual quote from the affidavit reads...

"I am able to swear, as I do hereby swear, that all facts and statements contained in this affidavit are true and correct and within my personal knowledge OR belief."

http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/tonysnow_vetaffadavit.pdf (see exhibit 2)

That single, misquoted word was foundational to the specious allegation that Mr. French "lied" in his affidavit...since he acknowledged other than first-hand knowledge in support of his sworn testimony. Mr. French's actual words rendered that allegation moot. Nor was Mr. Kramer unique in his shoddy reporting...

http://www.kgw.com/news-local/stories/kgw_082304_news_french_protest.a701071e.html#

Samuel A. Mullen-Perron wrote on Jul 14, 2007 8:14 PM:

Is this suppose to be a surprise to everyone? If it is then I am flabergasted because all we need to do is look that the polls. The Ironic think about this is supposidly over 50% of the votes were in favor of Bush during the 2004 election. As Connie Frances sang sometime ago; Who's Sorry Now?!?!?


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections