Judge orders prosecutors to disclose payments in terror case

Font Size:  Default font size  Large font size 


Wednesday, February 26, 2003 | 1 comment(s)

PORTLAND (AP) - A federal judge ordered prosecutors Tuesday to reveal how much they paid an informant who recorded evidence during a terrorism investigation that led to the arrest of five Portland residents.

U.S. District Judge Robert Jones also ordered U.S. Attorney Charles Gorder to reveal whether Khalid Ibrahim Mostafa, an Egyptian-born mechanic, had worked as an informant previously and for which law enforcement agencies.

The Drug Enforcement Administration recruited Mostafa to infiltrate what Attorney General John Ashcroft called a terrorist cell based in Portland after an arrest on weapons and possibly drug charges.

A defense contention that he did it for money could undermine Mostafa's credibility as a witness.

The judge's orders came during evidence hearings in U.S. District Court, the first substantial developments in the case since the five defendants were arrested last October.

The defendants appeared Tuesday in blue jumpsuits, ankle chains rattling as they shuffled into the wood-paneled courtroom on the 16th floor of the Mark O. Hatfield Courthouse.

Prosecutors and defense attorneys used the hearing to debate a range of motions concerning evidence in the case. The judge deferred formal decisions on most issues until Wednesday.

Defense attorneys are questioning evidence collected under 36 warrants issued by a top secret court in Washington D.C., the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance court, or "spy court."

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act was passed in 1978 as a way to fight Cold War espionage. Attorneys are also challenging aspects of the USA Patriot Act, which was passed in the aftermath of the Sept. 11 attacks. It expanded the spy court's power.

On this issue, Jones mulled a suggestion by prosecutors that he read applications for the secret warrants alone in his office, without allowing defense lawyers to see the documents. He also said he is ready to allow defense attorneys to review classified documents, if necessary, in a safe room inside the courthouse.

"We're all working on a new slate here," he said. "There have been no cases like this in Oregon."
PreviousEmail this story to yourself or a friendPrint this storyNext

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments above are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person’s privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.

    Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

    Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day.

    Close Guidelines
  • Polly Parks wrote on Feb 13, 2007 5:37 AM:

    The oral ad is highly offensive.

    (optional)
       

    The World Link - Search Advanced

    Blogroll

    Editors Note | Blog The World Forums

    Most Popular


    » View Past Poll Results
    » Suggest a Poll

    Marketplace



    Special Sections

    More Special Sections
    Sponsored links
    Click here for your local weather!